Julius Goldman's Egg City v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, Judge
A push for summary judgment is often pressed by one party or the other as a short-cut to by-pass what looms as a long or tedious trial on the facts. But we know that such a *348short-cut is blocked where there are disputed issues of material fact and the case cannot be decided as a matter of law on the uncontroverted facts. This is just such a litigation. The defendant alone has moved for summary judgment; the plaintiff insists that a trial is needed. Because we find summary judgment inappropriate under the controlling standard, we must remand to the Trial Division to determine most of the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Dunlop v. BachowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Miller v. SchoeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Julius Goldman's Egg City v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Colvin Cattle Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- The Estate of Wayne Hage v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Missouri Health & Medical Organization, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.