Legal Opinion

Julius Goldman's Egg City v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 15, 1977No. 364-75PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, Judge

A push for summary judgment is often pressed by one party or the other as a short-cut to by-pass what looms as a long or tedious trial on the facts. But we know that such a *348short-cut is blocked where there are disputed issues of material fact and the case cannot be decided as a matter of law on the uncontroverted facts. This is just such a litigation. The defendant alone has moved for summary judgment; the plaintiff insists that a trial is needed. Because we find summary judgment inappropriate under the controlling standard, we must remand to the Trial Division to determine most of the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Dunlop v. BachowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Miller v. SchoeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Julius Goldman's Egg City v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. Colvin Cattle Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. The Estate of Wayne Hage v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  4. Missouri Health & Medical Organization, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  5. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API