Schagene v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WEINSTEIN, Judge.
Plaintiff has moved to proceed in forma pauperis with her complaint against the United States. That motion is granted. The clerk of the court is directed to file the complaint as of the original date of receipt. However, the complaint is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), for being frivolous and for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted.
Plaintiffs motion to proceed in for-ma pauperis raises an interesting question. Access to the courts of the United States for even the poorest of citizens has long been a right in this country. Congress…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Waltner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Cooper v. GarciaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1999
- Jefferson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Young v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Manning v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.