Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Garcia

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 27, 1999No. 98CV1937 (LAB)PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT [Doc. No. 11]

BURNS, United States Magistrate Judge.

Pending before this Court is defendants Motion to Dismiss the Complaint against Rosie Garcia, O’Donnell, and J. Nettles under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rules 12(b), 12(b)(1), and 12(b)(6). [Doc. No. 11.] 1 Plaintiff in pro per, Frederick A. Cooper, did not file an Opposition to the motion. Moving parties did not request any oral argument. The matter was taken under submission on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). Upon careful…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rivera v. WhitmanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
  2. Smeltzer v. HookDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2002
  3. Johnson v. TrueDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2000
  4. Blackmon v. CrawfordDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2004
  5. Howard v. HeadlyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API