Manning v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Purported claims of patent infringement and taking of intellectual property; application to proceed in forma pauperis; scope and administration of 28 U.S.C. § 1915; frivolous claims
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
Plaintiff Robert Lee Manning, Jr., seeks monetary damages of more than a trillion dollars from the United States for infringement of “intellectual property,” fraud, and discrimination. Compl. ¶ S3. 1 Mr. Manning alleges that he invented an interstellar spaceship and weather machine, and that the United States has infringed upon or taken this intellectual property, fraudulently…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Evelyn Martinez v. Kristi Kleaners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Dorothy Floyd v. United States Postal Service, Donald Harants, PostmasterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Matthews v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Floyd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Bennett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Brestle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Brunet v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Double Lion Uchet Express Trust v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.