Legal Opinion
First Federal Lincoln Bank v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 6, 2003No. 95-518CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARGOLIS, Senior Judge.
This Winstar-related ease is before the Court following a four-day trial on the issue of liability. Plaintiff, First Federal Lincoln Bank (“Lincoln”), alleges that the defendant, United States (“Government”), in enacting the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIRREA”), breached its contract with regard to transactions with three savings and loan associations or thrifts. Specifically, plaintiff contends that it had a contract with the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (“FHLBB”), a part of the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- California Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- First Federal Lincoln Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Anchor Savings Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- First Commerce Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- First Federal Lincoln Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- First Federal Lincoln Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- American Federal Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- First Federal Lincoln Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- First Federal Lincoln Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.