Legal Opinion

Bledsoe County v. McReynolds

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1985PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FONES, Justice.

We granted Bledsoe County’s Rule eleven application to decide the controlling issue in this case, to-wit: whether property owners who improve a public road in the mistaken belief that it was a private road, are entitled to be reimbursed by the governmental entity responsible for maintenance of the road.

This suit was brought to require defendants to reopen Meadow Creek Road to public use. Defendants own land adjacent to Meadow Creek Road and responded by denying that it was a public road and asserting that if it was a public road, it had been abandoned. Alternatively, if…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. Shelby CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Lawrence County v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Reed v. Rhea CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Gas-light Co. v. MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1894
  5. State ex rel. Moulton v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Amos v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. City of Lebanon v. BairdTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  3. William H. Thompson, Jr. v. Department of Codes Administration, Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  4. Elizabethton Housing & Development Agency, Inc. v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  5. First Tennessee Bank National Ass'n v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API