Legal Opinion

Paduch v. City of Johnson City

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1995PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REID, Justice.

The City of Johnson City asserts on this appeal that the Court of Appeals erred in sustaining the suit by appellees as an action to abate a nuisance and in awarding damages because the city did not pave a street abutting property owned by the appellees and refused to issue a building permit until the street was paved.

When the area which included the street and adjoining property was annexed by Johnson City in 1963, the street was, in the words of the trial judge, a country lane. After the property was annexed, the city posted a sign designating it “Quarry Drive” and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kirby v. MacOn CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Peerless Construction Co. v. BassTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Pate v. City of MartinTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  4. City of Lebanon v. BairdTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Collier v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water DivisionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Faust v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  2. Juban v. SchermerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Meighan v. U.S. Sprint Communications Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Sexton v. Sevier CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  5. William H. Thompson, Jr. v. Department of Codes Administration, Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API