Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. City of Nashville

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1935PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Special Justice Edward J. Smith

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The bill, which was filed by Rutherford as a taxpayer and resident of the city of Nashville on behalf of himself and other taxpayers, who, it was alleged, pay taxes the proceeds of which go into the general fund of the City, sought to enjoin a diversion of such funds for the purpose of putting into effect Ordinance 903, the validity of which was challenged on eleven grounds.

A temporary injunction was prayed and granted, restraining the city from arresting citizens or assessing fines for failure to have a driver’s license…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Thompson v. SmithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  2. Holt v. City CouncilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  3. Wheelock v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. State Ex Rel. Lightman v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Mengle Box Co. v. Lauderdale CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Balsinger v. Town of MadisonvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  2. City of Lebanon v. BairdTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Davidson County v. RogersTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Thomas v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
  5. Sullins v. ButlerTennessee Supreme Court · 1940

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API