O'NEAL v. Price
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge IKUTA; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge THOMAS
IKUTA, Circuit Judge:
The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PLRA”), 110 Stat. 1321-71, precludes a prisoner from proceeding in forma pauperis if on three or more prior occasions the prisoner incurred a “strike,” that is, had brought an action that was dismissed because it was frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)1. In this appeal, Louis O’Neal *1148challenges the district court’s determination that he incurred three strikes. Because we agree that the three prior actions identified…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Andrews v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by583 opinions
- Lomax v. Ortiz-MarquezSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Jason Lee Harris v. J. Kenneth MangumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Adonai El-Shaddai v. Jeffrey Wang, MdCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- McLean v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Thomas Richey v. D. DahneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
578 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.