Legal Opinion

O'NEAL v. Price

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 14, 2008No. 06-15591PublishedCited by 583 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge IKUTA; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge THOMAS

IKUTA, Circuit Judge:

The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PLRA”), 110 Stat. 1321-71, precludes a prisoner from proceeding in forma pauperis if on three or more prior occasions the prisoner incurred a “strike,” that is, had brought an action that was dismissed because it was frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)1. In this appeal, Louis O’Neal *1148challenges the district court’s determination that he incurred three strikes. Because we agree that the three prior actions identified…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Andrews v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by583 opinions

  1. Lomax v. Ortiz-MarquezSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  2. Jason Lee Harris v. J. Kenneth MangumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Adonai El-Shaddai v. Jeffrey Wang, MdCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. McLean v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  5. Thomas Richey v. D. DahneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

578 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API