Legal Opinion
Andrews v. King
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 10, 2005No. 02-17440PublishedCited by 1,342 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge PAEZ; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge FERNANDEZ.
ORDER
The opinion filed on February 11, 2005 is amended to include Judge Fernandez’s concurring and dissenting opinion.
OPINION
PAEZ, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Antolin Andrews, an inmate in California State Prison-Solano (“CSP-So-lano”), filed a pro se complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 challenging the way in which the prison officials administered the *1116process for resolving prisoner grievances. After the district court granted Andrews’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP ”), the defendants filed a motion for…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Donald Robin BARREN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom HARRINGTON, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Kenneth Jay Wilson v. Lewis Yaklich, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee. Kenneth Jay Wilson v. Mary SanfordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Jerardo Rodriguez v. David Cook, Director, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,342 opinions
- Andrews v. CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Lira v. HerreraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Eric Knapp v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- O'NEAL v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Washington v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
1,337 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.