Legal Opinion

McLean v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 21, 2009No. 06-7784PublishedCited by 315 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MICHAEL, Circuit Judge:

The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996 (PLRA or Act), Pub.L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321-71 (1996), limits the ability of prisoners to file civil actions without prepayment of filing fees. When a prisoner has previously filed at least three actions or appeals that were dismissed on the grounds that they were frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, the Act’s “three strikes” provision requires that the prisoner demonstrate imminent danger of seri*394ous physical injury in order to proceed without prepayment of fees. 28…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by315 opinions

  1. Coleman v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  2. Lomax v. Ortiz-MarquezSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  3. Dawn Ball v. FamiglioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  4. James Blakely v. Robert WardsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  5. Jeffery Paul v. Helen MarberryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

310 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API