Legal Opinion
Colonial Williamsburg Foundation v. Kittinger Co.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided May 20, 1992No. Civ. A. 3:91CV00055PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
RICHARD L. WILLIAMS, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motions of the plaintiff, The Colonial Williamsburg Foundation (“Colonial Williamsburg”), for a finding of civil contempt against The Kittinger Company (“Kittinger”), Michael P. Carlow (“Car-low”), and Nicholas J. DeFino (“DeFino”), and for sanctions for violations of the Consent Judgment entered by this Court on February 25, 1991, and the Court’s February 19, 1992, Discovery Order. Following a hearing on these issues on May 4 and 5, 1992, the Court now makes the following…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Arthur Hollander v. American Cyanamid Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Rhodes v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Ashcraft v. Conoco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. John A. Voss, United States of America v. Mitchell S. Beals, United States of America v. Brent L. BealsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- In Re General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Melina AliCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Federal Trade Commission v. H.G. KuykendallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.