Legal Opinion
United States v. John A. Voss, United States of America v. Mitchell S. Beals, United States of America v. Brent L. Beals
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 28, 1996No. 94-1320 to 94-1322PublishedCited by 113 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY, Circuit Judge.
The defendants John A. Voss, Mitchell S. Beals, and Brent L. Beals appeal their jury convictions and sentences for criminal contempt under 18 U.S.C. § 401(3). They argue that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support their convictions, that the district court applied the wrong provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines when calculating their sentences, and that the court improperly increased their offense levels for substantial interference with the administration of justice. Additionally, John Voss and Brent Beals argue that the district court…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- International Longshoremen's Ass'n, Local 1291 v. Philadelphia Marine Trade Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Spallone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Antonelli v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- United States v. ChanthadaraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Summers v. Missouri Pacific Railroad SystemCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Wolfgang v. Mid-America Motorsports, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. William Riley SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.