Legal Opinion

Nicoletti v. Damerow Ford Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 11, 1979No. A7702-02765, CA 10103PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

Defendant appeals from the trial court’s award of attorney fees to plaintiff following a jury award of damages.

Plaintiff brought an action against defendant for damages to his vehicle while in bailment, alleging in his complaint a right to attorney fees pursuant to an agreement with the defendant and praying "$1,750 as reasonable attorney’s fees.” The allegation was denied by defendant in its answer.

The agreement between the parties, which was in the form of a work order, made the following provision for attorney fees:

"If any of such charges remain unpaid for thirty (30) days after such…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. KendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Draper v. MULLENNEXOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Pritchett v. FryOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Gorman v. BoyerOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Pritchett v. FryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kashmir Corp. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. Hamer v. MayedaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Jewell v. Triple B. Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API