Legal Opinion

Gorman v. Boyer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1976PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying attorney fees to defendant in an action on a contract which provided that in the event of litigation the plaintiff was to be paid "such reasonable attorneys’ fees as may be fixed by the court on trial and on appeal.”

In their pleadings both plaintiff and defendant requested attorney fees. The case went to trial with both parties offering evidence on the merits of the case. Neither party offered any evidence as to the reasonable value of attorney fees, nor was there any stipulation on that subject.

The trial court took the case under advisement and by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. KendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Dean Vincent, Inc. v. Krishell Laboratories, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Tiano v. ElsensohnOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Sherwood & Roberts-Oregon, Inc. v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Wells v. WellsOregon Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Carlson v. BlumensteinOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Seattle-First National Bank v. ScheiberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Long v. StormsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. 1600 Barberry Lane 8 v. Cottonwood ResidentialUtah Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Shipler v. Van RadenOregon Supreme Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API