Legal Opinion

Pritchett v. Fry

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1979No. CA 8936, SC 25890PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

The issue in this case is whether attorney fees under ORS 91.755 in a forcible entry and detainer proceeding are to be treated as part of costs or whether they must be pleaded and proved at trial. The Court of Appeals held that attorney fees were allowable as part of the cost bill. We granted plaintiff’s petition for review.

The statute, ORS 91.755, states in pertinent part:

" * * * reasonable attorney fees may be awarded to the prevailing party together with costs and necessary disbursements * *

Plaintiff filed this action to recover possession of an apartment rented to defendant. Defendant’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. KendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Draper v. MULLENNEXOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. PACIFIC NORTHWEST DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. HollowayOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State Ex Rel. Nilsen v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Tiano v. ElsensohnOregon Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Brewer v. ErwinOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. All-States Leasing Co. v. OchsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. Shipler v. Van RadenOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. L & M Investment Co. v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Grove v. Hindquarter Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API