Legal Opinion
Rothey Bros. v. Elizabeth Township
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 14, 1955No. Appeal, No. 36PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Horace Stern,
Plaintiff, Rothey Bros., Inc., filed a complaint in mandamus against the Commissioners of Elizabeth Township, Allegheny County, alleging that on or about June 1, 1953, it made application for the approval of a proposed subdivision plan of lots for recording purposes; that the plan had been approved on that date by the Allegheny County Planning Commission; that although numerous conferences have been held in reference thereto the Commissioners have either neglected or refused to approve the plan so that plaintiff has been unable to proceed with the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hotel Casey Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Kelley v. PommerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Edelman v. Boardman, Secretary of RevenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Coghlan v. Beaver Falls CouncilSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Schenley Farms Co. v. McGovernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
3Cited by5 opinions
- LARSON v. Peirce Junior CollegeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Dively v. Ohio TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Crowley v. Freedom Township, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County1989
- Greenberg v. Buckingham Township Supervisors, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1974
- Spadaccino v. Middletown Township Supervisors, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1965