Legal Opinion

Greenberg v. Buckingham Township Supervisors

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County

Decided December 23, 1974No. 74-8736-05-6Published

1Opinion of the Court

GARB, J.,

Plaintiffs herein have instituted this action in mandamus to which *303defendant filed preliminary objections. An amended complaint was filed and additional preliminary objections taken thereto as in the nature of a motion to strike and a demurrer. We dispose herein of those prehminary objections.

The first three of the preliminary objections are in the nature of a motion to strike the complaint. The first of these is a motion to strike for lack of conformity with Pa. R.C.P. 1002 and 1024. The verification to the amended complaint was taken by counsel for plaintiffs. Rule 1002 provides…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Clevenstein v. RizzutoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Unger v. Hampton TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Knup v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Philadelphia Presbytery Homes, Inc. v. Abington Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Porter v. Bloomsburg State CollegeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API