Legal Opinion

Schenley Farms Co. v. McGovern

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1933No. Appeal, 95PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

June 30, 1933:

This litigation grows out of a contract between The Schenley Farms Company, plaintiff herein, and the County Commissioners of Allegheny County, by which the former agreed to sell and the latter to buy what is known as the . “Town Hall Site” in the City of Pittsburgh, the purchase price of which was to be paid out of the proceeds of county bonds to be sold for that purpose. Those interested in the prior litigation will find it detailed in Sheets v. Armstrong, 307 Pa. 385, and Palmer’s App., 307 Pa. 426.

Plaintiff instituted the present proceeding by a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Souder v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Century Co. v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  3. Commonwealth v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  4. Sheets v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Palmer's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kaufman Construction Co. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Edelman v. Boardman, Secretary of RevenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Nevling v. Commercial Credit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Thayer v. McCaslin, ControllerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Schenley Farms Co. v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API