Legal Opinion
Borough of Heidelberg v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 20, 2007No. 42 WAP 2006PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice EAKIN.
Rowene Selva (appellee) filed a claim petition against the Borough of Heidelberg and Inservco Insurance Services, Inc. (appellants) seeking wage loss benefits for an injury she sustained October 17, 2003, while volunteering as an emergency medical technician (EMT) for the borough. 1 Before the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ), appellee testified she was the secretary of the Heidelberg Volunteer Fire Department and also responded to ambulance calls for the borough’s ambulance corps. WCJ Decision, 11/29/04, at 1. She stated she was 64 years old and had not had a paying job…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hannaberry HVAC v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Chanceford Aviation Properties, L.L.P. v. Chanceford Township Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Gardner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Dugan v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Phoenixville Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Bufford v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. LeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Gentex Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.