Legal Opinion

Boundary Backpackers v. Boundary County

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1996No. 21287PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This case concerns a county ordinance that requires all federal and state agencies to comply with a county land use policy plan. We conclude that the ordinance violates the U.S. Constitution because federal law preempts portions of the ordinance and that the entire ordinance is invalid because these portions are not severable. We also conclude that the one individual who has standing to challenge the ordinance is not entitled to attorney fees under the private attorney general doctrine.

I

THE BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

In 1992, the Boundary County Board of Commissioners…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. California Coastal Commission v. Granite Rock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Miles v. Idaho Power Co. Ex Rel. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood of Idaho, Inc. v. WasdenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Young v. City of KetchumIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Thomson v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Van Valkenburgh v. Citizens for Term LimitsIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Friends of Minidoka v. Jerome CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2012

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API