Legal Opinion
Van Valkenburgh v. Citizens for Term Limits
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided December 6, 2000No. 26080PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SILAK, Justice.
NATURE OF THE CASE
This is a petition for a writ of prohibition and application for a declaratory judgment seeking to prevent the Secretary of State from taking any action pursuant to I.C. § 34-970B and seeking to have I.C. § 34-907B declared unconstitutional under both the Idaho Constitution and the United States Constitution. The Petitioners, Jack Van Valkenburgh, Penny Fletcher, W. Anthony Park, and Larry Eastland, argue I.C. § 34-907B violates the guarantees of freedom of speech and the right to vote found in both the Idaho Constitution and the United States Constitution.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New PartySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Olsen v. J.A. Freeman Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Planned Parenthood of Idaho, Inc. v. WasdenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Young v. City of KetchumIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Friends of Minidoka v. Jerome CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Ameritel Inns, Inc. v. Greater Boise Auditorium DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. Philip Morris, R.J. ReynoldsIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.