Legal Opinion
Honeywell Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided September 23, 1981No. 443-79CPublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBennett, Judge
*592Plaintiff has moved for summary judgment in this contract case on the grounds that the decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (the board) is erroneous and not entitled to finality because it fails to comply with the standards of the Wunderlich Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 321, 322 (1976). The failure is said to rest upon both errors of fact and law. Defendant has filed a cross-motion for summary judgment, and asks that we sustain the board. Plaintiff has also suggested that we refer the case to a trial judge for his analysis of the administrative record, which has been supplied to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Philbrook v. GlodgettSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- United States v. WiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Data General Corp. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Vons Companies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Faire Feaz v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- The United States v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.