Deaton v. State Accident Insurance Fund
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.
The issue in this case is the extent of disability sustained by claimant. The resolution of it leads us to a further discussion of what 2 Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law § 57.51, refers to as the “odd-lot” doctrine which we first cited with approval in Swanson v. Westport Lumber Co., 4 Or App 417, 479 P2d 1005 (1971), and to a discussion of what part a claimant’s motivation to return to work plays in determining what is a proper award.
Claimant, having sustained a serious compensable injury, received an initial award of 192 degrees unscheduled disability and 30 degrees for partial loss of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Surratt v. Gunderson Bros. Engineering Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Swanson v. Westport Lumber CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- Wilson v. Gilchrist Timber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- Jenness v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
3Cited by47 opinions
- Oster v. Wetzel Printing, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- Wilson v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Gordon v. WestIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Barbato v. Alsan Masonry & Concrete, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Crocker v. Eastland Woolen Mill, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.