Legal Opinion

Kajundzich v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1940PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

Plaintiff was injured in the course of his employment while working as a choker chaser for the Tidewater Timber Company. The State Industrial Accident Commission awarded him compensation on the basis of permanent partial disability of 48° which is equivalent to a loss of 75 per cent in the function of a foot. It is not recited in the final order closing claimant’s case and making the above award that the disability refers to an injury of the foot, but the evidence plainly indicates that such was the intention of the commission.

Claimant, after denial of his petition for rehearing, appealed to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Petroleum Casualty Co. v. SealeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  2. Soukup v. Shores Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  3. Claim of Dowling v. Church E. Gates & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Greseck v. Farmers Union Elevator Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Rhinelander Paper Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hannan v. Good Samaritan HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  2. Surratt v. Gunderson Bros. Engineering Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Walker v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Hoffmeister v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Jones v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1968

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API