Legal Opinion

Hannan v. Good Samaritan Hospital

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 11, 1970PublishedCited by 121 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*180SCHWAB, C. J.

We are again required to review a compensation claim in which the parties disputing the nature and extent of claimant’s disability have wended their weary way to this court at considerable expense in time and money, not only to them, but also to the state. The number of briefs we have received from claimants and direct responsibility employers, arguing not only the issues of the individual cases, but the proper scope of judicial review, lead us to discuss the history and effect of the present Workmen’s Compensation Law before embarking on a review of the case at hand.

Stated in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rea v. ReaOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Coday v. WILLAMETTE TUG & BARGE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. OMLIE ET UX v. HuntOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Leach v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  5. Ryf v. Hoffman Construction CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by121 opinions

  1. Hannan v. Good Samaritan HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  2. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. Surratt v. Gunderson Bros. Engineering Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Swanson v. Westport Lumber CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  5. Bowman v. Oregon Transfer Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API