Legal Opinion

Heinsheimer v. Schulte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 7, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by Anton H. Meyer, as assignee, etc., from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 21th day of June, 1913, declaring the existence of an attorney’s lien and directing a reference.

1Opinion of the Court

Page, J.:

On November 16, 1909, when the action of Meyer v. Schulte was commenced, the petitioner, Norbert Heinsheimer, was general counsel for the United States Restaurant and Realty Company under an annual retainer of $5,000, and prepared and conducted it together with various other matters under his contract as general counsel. On February 12, 1910, William F. McCombs was made general counsel for the said company in his place, but the petitioner was thereafter, retained as special counsel for the purpose of conducting the action, and' he prosecuted it to judgment. The judgment for $4,176.64…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. . IngersollNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Dunn v. Hudson River Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Wiles Laundering Co. v. . HahloNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. West v. BaconAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  5. Meyer v. . SchulteNew York Court of Appeals · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re BabcockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  2. Heinsheimer v. SchulteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API