In re Boehm
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Charges by the Bar Association of the city of New York to discipline the respondent, an attorney at law.
1Per curiam
The respondent was admitted to practice in February, 1899, and has continued since that time to practice in the city of New York. In the fall of 1906 he was retained by one Lottie Thompson to bring an action on a promissory note and at that time he received the sum of twenty-five dollars for disbursements and made an agreement with his client that he should have for his compensation one-quarter of the amount recovered. He prepared a complaint which was verified by his client on May 28, 1907. The defendant in that action interposed an answer and the case was at issue in June, 1907. The…
2Cited by3 opinions
- In re BabcockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- In re RotweinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- In re ClayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939