Legal Opinion
Aragon v. Kasulka
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided May 8, 1961No. 6851PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COMPTON, Chief Justice.
These actions arose out of the same occurrence and, by agreement of the parties, were consolidated for trial and for hearing on appeal.
The plaintiffs, Joe Aragon and Emma S. Aragon, filed an action against the defendants to recover damages for injuries sustained by them as a result of a collision of a truck driven by the defendant Kasulka, agent of the defendant Ferguson-Steere, a corporation, with an automobile driven by the plaintiff, Emma S. Aragon, at or near the intersection of State Highways 47 and 6, east o.f Belen. The complaint alleges that the collision and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Baldwin v. EwingIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
- Page v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Brown v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Frank Bond & Son, Inc. v. Reserve Minerals Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- Malinauskas v. Public Service Interstate Transportation Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stokes v. MorganNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Martin v. McCarryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
- State v. JamesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Stark-Romero v. National Railroad Passenger Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- Koenig v. Frank's Plastering CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.