Legal Opinion

Stokes v. Morgan

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1984No. 14798PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FEDERICI, Chief Justice.

This is an action involving two applications for change in point of diversion and place of use of groundwater rights in the Portales Underground Water Basin (Basin). The State Engineer approved the changes and the protestants appealed the decisions to the District Court of Roosevelt County. By agreement of the parties, the actions were combined for trial. In a trial de novo the court ruled in favor of the protestants and denied the transfers. Both applicants appealed the district court decision. We reverse.

On December 1, 1981, the Federal Land Bank of Wichita…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Toltec International, Inc. v. Village of RuidosoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. LewisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Application of BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Mathers v. Texaco, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Morningstar Water Users Ass'n v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  3. Montgomery v. Lomos Altos, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Santa Fe Exploration Co. v. Oil Conservation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Groendyke Transport, Inc. v. New Mexico State Corp. CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API