Legal Opinion

Tate v. Detroit Receiving Hospital

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 2002No. Docket 225833PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCooper, P.J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right the trial court’s order granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition and dismissing this medical malpractice action. We reverse and remand.

I. background facts and procedural history

Robert Hall was admitted to defendant hospital after suffering a stroke. During Hall’s hospitalization a urinary catheter was inserted. Shortly thereafter, defendant’s employees made a notation on Hall’s charts regarding a possible urinary tract infection. However, Hall was transferred from defendant hospital without any treatment for this possible infection. On the day of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McDougall v. SchanzMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Nawrocki v. MacOmb County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. MacOmb County Prosecutor v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Horace v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Fane v. Detroit Library CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Johanna Woodard v. University of Mich Medical CtrMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Woodard v. CusterMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Grondin v. CuriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. Gonzalez v. St John Hospital & Medical CenterMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Nippa v. Botsford General HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API