Legal Opinion

Fane v. Detroit Library Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 2001No. Docket 116708, 116711PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

These consolidated cases question the scope of the public building exception to governmental immunity 1 in light of this Court’s ruling in Horace v City of Pontiac, 456 Mich 744; 575 NW2d 762 (1998). The parties in Fane dispute whether the elevated terrace where plaintiff fell is part of Detroit’s main public library building. In Cox, this Court must determine whether a portable ramp placed at a doorstep is part of the Fairlane Estate building in Dearborn.

We conclude that the public building exception can apply to parts of a building that extend beyond the walls. We hold the public building…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wade v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Reardon v. Department of Mental HealthMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Horace v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Velmer v. Baraga Area SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Jackson v. DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Oakpointe Villa Nursing Centre, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Waltz v. WyseMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Wold Architects and Engineers v. StratMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Maskery v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Altobelli v. HartmannMichigan Supreme Court · 2016

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API