First State Bank of Kensington v. Braaten
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Stone, Justice.
Suit by payee against maker of a promissory note. The verdict was for defendant. There was no motion for new trial. Plain tiff’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict denied, it appeals from the judgment for defendant. That requires us to consider only whether there is evidence to sustain the judgment. Taylor v. Northern States Power Co. 196 Minn. 22, 264 N. W. 139.
The single issue is whether the evidence sustains the defense of conditional delivery with condition unperformed, so that the note never went into effect as a contract.
In January, 1927, defendant’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Skelton v. GrimmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Taylor v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Towle-Jamieson Investment Co. v. BrannanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Deden v. GrosseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
3Cited by2 opinions
- LeRoy v. Marquette National Bank of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Skogberg v. HjelmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941