Legal Opinion

First State Bank of Kensington v. Braaten

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 10, 1940No. 32,311PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stone, Justice.

Suit by payee against maker of a promissory note. The verdict was for defendant. There was no motion for new trial. Plain tiff’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict denied, it appeals from the judgment for defendant. That requires us to consider only whether there is evidence to sustain the judgment. Taylor v. Northern States Power Co. 196 Minn. 22, 264 N. W. 139.

The single issue is whether the evidence sustains the defense of conditional delivery with condition unperformed, so that the note never went into effect as a contract.

In January, 1927, defendant’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Skelton v. GrimmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  2. Taylor v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  3. Towle-Jamieson Investment Co. v. BrannanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Deden v. GrosseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. LeRoy v. Marquette National Bank of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Skogberg v. HjelmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API