Legal Opinion

Deden v. Grosse

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 5, 1932No. 28,707PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action for contribution by one of two accommodation makers of a promissory note against the other. There were findings and an order for judgment against defendant Grosse, who appeals from the order denying his alternative motion for amended findings or a new trial. Plaintiff is the father and defendant the father-in-law of Ernest Deden, who was impleaded and voluntarily appeared as a party during the course of the trial.

The principal indebtedness of $6,000, with some additions by way of interest, has been paid by plaintiff because of his liability on a note to a Red Wing bank which he signed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pope v. HoefsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fithian v. JamarCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. First State Bank of Kensington v. BraatenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API