Legal Opinion

Felton v. West

California Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1894No. 15456PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

The appellants, on May 16, 1893, executed and delivered to the respondent their promissory note for the sum of ninety thousand eight hundred and sixty dollars and twenty-six cents. This note was dated, delivered, and made payable in San Francisco. It was secured by a mortgage upon lands situated in the state of Oregon. The appellants made two payments thereon, and then defaulted. Respondent thereupon began suit in the proper court in Oregon to foreclose the said mortgage. He was unable to, and did not, obtain personal service of the summons in such action upon appellants, as they were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ould v. StoddardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Blumberg v. BirchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Commercial Bank v. KershnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Winklemen v. SidesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Younker v. Reseda ManorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. First-Trust Joint Stock Land Bank of Chicago v. MeredithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. McGue v. RommelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API