Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Continental Supply Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 22, 1926No. 7139PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENYON, Circuit Judge.
The Continental Supply Company (defendant in error) was plaintiff in the trial court, and for convenience will be so designated here. In November, 1920, it sold to the Plateau Oil Corporation (herein designated the Plateau Company) certain oil well supplies. Plaintiffs in error, Taylor, Staley, and Frantz, were defendants in the trial court, and we shall so designate them here. They were officers, directors, and stockholders of said Plateau Company, which was preparing to drill an oil well in Kansas, known as the Hell Creek well. Defendants executed an agreement with…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Head v. HargraveSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- American Bonding Co. of Baltimore v. Pueblo Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Brown v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Michael-Regan Co. v. LindellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Woodbury v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- Hadar Leasing International Co. v. D.H. Overmyer Telecasting Co. (In Re D.H. Overmyer Telecasting Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1982
- Willis M. Duryea, Jr. v. The Third Northwestern National Bank of Minneapolis, a National Banking Association Bruce Winslow, John Doe and Mary RoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Henry P. Jaeger and M. Darlene Jaeger v. The Canadian Bank of Commerce (California)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.