Legal Opinion

Whitten v. Wright

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 8, 1939No. 32,141PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gallagher, Chief Justice.

On appeal from a judgment of the district court charging defendant as constructive trustee of certain property and the proceeds therefrom, the sufficiency of the findings of fact (which are not disputed) to support the conclusions of law and judgment entered in pursuance thereof is questioned.

The substance of the facts found by the trial court follows. Defendant, during all times herein mentioned, was employed by the Park Eegion Timber Company, at Brainerd, Minnesota, co-partnership consisting of S. J. Zeman and E. B. Sullivan, and engaging in the production and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Latta v. KilbournSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Henderson v. MurraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  5. Hegenmyer v. MarksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Knox v. KnoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. L. A. Young Spring & Wire Corp. v. FallsMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Dietz v. DietzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  5. Wilcox v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API