Legal Opinion

Sabrinos v. Chamberlain

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1890No. 2635PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Nueces. Tried below before Hon. J. C. Russell.

1Opinion of the Court

ÁCKEB, Presiding Judge.

Appellants were plaintiffs in the court below. A general demurrer to the petition was sustained and the suit dismissed. That ruling is asssigned as error. The original petition was filed on the 9th day of September, 1881, and the amended petition against which the general demurrer was directed was filed on the 9th day of February, 1886, in which the cause of action was stated substantially as follows:

That the defendant Bland Chamberlain qualified as administrator of the «state of Hiram Chamberlain, who died July 11, 1879, on the 8th day of October, 1879, with Bichard…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Franks v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Hefflefinger v. GeorgeTexas Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. King Ranch, Inc. v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Chapman v. King Ranch, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
  3. Cameron v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Thomas, Administrator v. HawpeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  5. Smith v. PaschalTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API