Legal Opinion

Smith v. Paschal

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided January 25, 1928No. 1036-4943PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNickels, J.

We refer to the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals (Paschal v. Hobby, 296 S. W. 336), for complete statement of the case. It is sufficient here to say that the matter presented must turn upon asserted nullity in the probate order purportedly authorizing and requiring the administrator, in final settlement, to deliver the remains of the estate to the county clerk. That delivery was made, the property was lost to those entitled to receive it finally, and the order (with compliance by the administrator) was held (by the Court of Civil Appeals) to be a complete defense available to the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Crawford v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Guinn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Foster v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Clayton v. HurtTexas Supreme Court · 1895

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Friedman v. American Surety Co. of New YorkTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Weber v. City of SachseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Manion v. LockhartTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Jones v. Sun Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Laird v. Gulf Production Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API