Legal Opinion

Chapman v. King Ranch, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided April 26, 2001No. 13-98-163-CVPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HINOJOSA, Justice.

Appellants, the heirs and devisees of William and Helen Chapman, brought a trespass to try title suit against appellees to establish their title to an undivided one-half interest in approximately 15,449.4 acres of land known as the “Rincon de Santa Gertrudis” (“the Rincon”). Appellants also sought a bill of review to set aside a consent judgment entered in 1883 which conveyed the Chapman family’s interest in the Rincon to Richard King. The trial court granted appellees’ motions for summary judgment. By five issues, appellants contend the trial court erred in granting…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison County Housing Finance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Carr v. BrasherTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Willis v. MaverickTexas Supreme Court · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. King Ranch, Inc. v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Oasis Oil Corp. v. Koch Refining Co. L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
  3. Lockett v. HB Zachry Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
  4. Russell v. American Real Estate Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  5. Ketter v. ESC Medical Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API