Legal Opinion

State v. Christie

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 1, 1993No. C5-92-968PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDEBRING, Justice.

This case stems from the increased sentence appellant received as a result of the application of the patterned sex offender statute, Minn.Stat. § 609.1352 (1990). The presumptive sentence for the offense to which appellant pleaded guilty, first degree burglary, was 68 months under the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines. After the trial court determined that the patterned sex offender statute applied, appellant received a sentence of 240 months. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s finding that appellant fell within the patterned sex offender statute, but remanded…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re BlodgettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. State v. RourkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  3. State v. GrossmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  4. State v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  5. State v. GrubeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API