Legal Opinion

In re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Delaware: Barakat

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 11, 2013No. 397, 2013PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Pending before us is an attorney disciplinary proceeding. Fred Barakat, Esquire, was found to have failed to maintain a bona fide office for the practice of law in Delaware, and to maintain adequate books and records as required by the Delaware Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct (the “Rules”). In a Report dated July 25, 2013, the Board on Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Delaware (the “Board”) found that Barakat’s course of conduct violated Rules 1.5(f), 1.15(a), 1.15(d), 3.4(c), 8.1(a), 8.4(c), and 8.4(d). Barakat maintains that his conduct has not violated the Rules,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Betts v. Townsends, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  3. Tolchin v. Supreme Court of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  4. In Re AbbottSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  5. In Re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of the State LassenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Delaware: MartinSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  2. Matter of a Member of the Bar: BeauregardSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API