Legal Opinion
Wronowski v. Redevelopment Agency
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 13, 1980PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCotter, C. J.
The defendant appeals under General Statutes § 8-132 from a judgment rendered upon the trial referee’s reassessment of damages and valuing of land and buildings taken as a part of a redevelopment project in New London. The referee, exercising the powers of the Superior Court, heard witnesses, viewed the property as well as the exhibits, and filed a report as required by statute, in which he found the total damages to be $710,000. The only issue pursued in this court is whether the referee, hereinafter referred to as the court, in determining the value of the property, erred in relying upon a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stanley Works v. New Britain Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Moss v. New Haven Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Housing Authority v. LustigSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Slavitt v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- D'ADDARIO v. Commissioner of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commissioner of Transportation v. Rocky Mountain, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Feigenbaum v. City of WaterburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Hensley v. Commissioner of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- City of West Haven v. NorbackSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Gray Line Bus Co. v. Greater Bridgeport Transit DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.