Gray Line Bus Co. v. Greater Bridgeport Transit District
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The principal issue presented in this appeal is whether in an eminent domain proceeding the condemning authority must compensate a public utility company for the “going concern value” of the enterprise, including the franchise itself, where the rate of return from the whole system is insufficient to warrant the investment necessary to acquire the physical assets of the system, i.e., the land, buildings and equipment necessary for its operation.
The plaintiff appealed the assessment of $532,000 damages filed by the defendant in taking the property of the plaintiff by eminent domain. The case…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Boston Chamber of Commerce v. City of BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- City of Omaha v. Omaha Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- New Haven Inclusion CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Citino v. Redevelopment AgencyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Transportation Plaza Associates v. PowersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Northeast Ct. Economic Alliance, Inc. v. ATC PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Commissioner v. Towpath AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Middletown Commercial Associates Ltd. Partnership v. City of MiddletownConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.