Legal Opinion
Housing Authority v. Lustig
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 17, 1952PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.
This is a proceeding brought pursuant to §§ 932 and 7181 of the General Statutes to condemn property of the named defendant for the purposes of the plaintiff. The committee to which the fixing of damages for the taking was referred made their report in the alternative. As clarified by stipulation of the parties, the report first assessed the value of the property in question as follows: Land, $1259; small shed, $50; garage, $500; poultry market bnilding, $6500; total, $8309. It then went on to state: “In the event that the owner of the poultry market building should be compensated for the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Edmands v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Andrews v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Pittsburgh, Virginia & Charleston Railway Co. v. VanceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
- Harvey Textile Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- King v. Minneapolis Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- City of Trenton v. LenznerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Budney v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Riddle v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Connecticut Printers, Inc. v. Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.