Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Ozmun

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1927No. 4833PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

Appellant brought this action to recover upon a promissory note, executed and delivered by respondent to appellant’s assignor, representing the purchase price of certain machinery. Respondent answered the complaint, admitting the execution of the note but denying that there was anything due thereon or that anything had been paid thereon; and as a further and separate answer, setting forth, among other things, that the consideration for the note was a Case tractor and baler; that appellant’s assignor warranted the tractor to be as good as new, but that it was worthless for any purpose except…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Frank v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Caples v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  3. McColgan v. MuirlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  4. Fruit v. FancherWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Newman ex rel. Newman v. Oregon Short Line RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Owen v. Taylor Ex Rel. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Smith v. Idaho State University Federal Credit UnionIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Kelson v. AhlbornIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Preston A. Blair Co. v. RoseIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Kelson v. AhlbornIdaho Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API