McColgan v. Muirland
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the City and County of San Francisco. M. C. Sloss, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCooper, J.
This is an action to recover upon a judgment obtained by plaintiff McColgan (who has assigned an undivided half of said judgment to plaintiff Athearn), against C. Walter Willey, in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, on the fourteenth day of March, 1893, for the sum of $1,076.70. Willey died in January, 1898, and the defendants are the executor and executrix of his last will. The judgment was duly presented as a claim properly verified, and was rejected. The defendants answered, and in their answer, as a defense only, alleged in substance: That on October 11, 1892,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hart v. ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Robinson v. GlassIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Swasey v. AdairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Carpentier v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Wilhite v. HamrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Cox v. SchnerrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- State ex rel. American Freehold-Land Mortgage Co. of London v. TannerWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- California Credit & Collection Corp. v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Siem v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.