Legal Opinion

Preston A. Blair Co. v. Rose

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1935No. 6282PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMobgan, J.

-This is an action in claim and delivery commenced and tried in the probate court. Judgment was for plaintiff and defendant appealed to the district court where the case was tried to a jury. That trial resulted in a verdict for plaintiff, upon which judgment was entered that it have, retain and recover from defendant possession of an automobile, the property involved in the action, together with its costs. The case is here on appeal from that judgment.

Counsel for appellant present these points:

“1. That the probate court had no jurisdiction of claim and delivery actions.
“2. That the complaint…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Porter Construction Co. v. BerryOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Bates v. Capital State BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Smith v. Washburn-Wilson Seed Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Cunningham v. StonerIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Oakes v. LakeSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bratton v. SliningerIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Owen v. Taylor Ex Rel. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Gooding v. KoonceIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Morrow v. Wm. Berklund Forest Products Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Morrow v. Wm. Berklund Forest Products Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API