Legal Opinion
Yes on 24-367 Committee v. Deaton
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 3, 2016No. 14C14391; A158181PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.
Plaintiff is a political committee that was organized to support the passage of a local ballot measure in Marion County in the May 2014 election. Defendants Deaton, Stormo, and Grant are individuals who placed a statement opposing the measure in the Marion County Voter Pamphlet.1 Before the election, plaintiff brought suit under ORS 260.532, alleging that defendants violated that statute by knowingly or recklessly making a false statement of material fact in their voters’ pamphlet statement.2 Defendants moved to strike the complaint under ORS 31.150, Oregon’s “anti-SL APP” statute. The trial…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gardner v. MartinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Wheeler v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- TURNER, ADM'R v. McCreadyOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Staten v. SteelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Mullen v. Meredith Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Plotkin v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Wingard v. Or. Family Council, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Bryant v. Recall for Lowell's Future CommitteeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- C.I.C.S. Emp't Servs., Inc. v. Newport Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Snook v. SwanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.