Deep Photonics Corp. v. LaChapelle
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtTookey, J.
These consolidated appeals arise from the trial court’s dismissal of a third-party complaint that Joseph LaChapelle and James Field (collectively plaintiffs) filed against Wayland Brill and Brill’s law firm, Enterprise Law Group, Inc. (collectively defendants). Defendants filed a special motion to strike the third-party complaint under ORS 31.150, Oregon’s anti-SLAPP1 statute, and a separate motion to dismiss under ORCP 21 A(8). The trial court denied the special motion to strike, concluding that the claims alleged in the third-party complaint did not qualify for treatment under ORS 31.150.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Granewich v. HardingOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 2014
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Davoodian v. RiveraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- Baldwin v. SeidaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Towner v. Bernardo/Silverton HealthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Craft Renovations Inc. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- Craft Renovations Inc. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.